Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question, Mark C. Langston
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question, Siegfried Langenbach
  • [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question, Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] First question, Milton Mueller
    • [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries, Christopher Ambler
• [wg-c] Statement of Interest, Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] Re: Mechanics (divertimento from First Question], Kevin J. Connolly
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [wg-c] Re: Mechanics (divertimento from First Question], Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] Committee membership?, Ivan Pope
• [wg-c] WG Chairs, Javier SOLA
  • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Siegfried Langenbach
    • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Mark C. Langston
    • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Joop Teernstra
      • [wg-c] NOMINATION for WG-C Co-Chair, J. William Semich
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Siegfried Langenbach
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Eva Frölich
    • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Eva Frölich
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Javier SOLA
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Ivan Pope
  • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Rita M. Odin
  • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Milton Mueller
    • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Javier
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs -- CALL FOR REMOVAL OF JAVIER SOLA AS CHAIR, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs -- CALL FOR REMOVAL OF JAVIER SOLA AS CHAIR, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Joop Teernstra
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Christopher Ambler
• [wg-c] Cross-posting, Javier SOLA
• [wg-c] Discussions of process impacting entire WG, Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination, Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination, Mark C. Langston
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination, Jean-Michel Becar
    • Re: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination, Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination, Siegfried Langenbach
  • SV: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination, Petter Rindforth
  • Re: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination, Kevin J. Connolly
  • FW: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determination, john.c.lewis
• Re: [wg-c-1] Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs, Jonathan Weinberg
• [wg-c] Disclosure, Javier
• [wg-c] Creating new gTLDs, Ivan Pope
  • Re: [wg-c] Creating new gTLDs, Dennis Jennings
• [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs, dwmaher
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs, Ivan Pope
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs, Siegfried Langenbach
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs, Kevin J. Connolly
  • [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] WORK: Question #1 New GTLDs, Ken Stubbs
• [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3, Ivan Pope
  • Re: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3, Siegfried Langenbach
  • Re: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3, Javier
  • Re: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3, Kent Crispin
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3, Ivan Pope
    • RE: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3, Javier
      • RE: [wg-c] Merging WG1 and WG3, Jonathan Weinberg
• [wg-c] Javier, what are you doing?, Mark C. Langston
  • [wg-c] Mailing lists, Javier
• [wg-c] wg-c-3 discussion mandate, Ivan Pope
• [wg-c] WG questions, Ivan Pope
  • Re: [wg-c] WG questions, Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] WG questions, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] WG questions, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] WG questions, Kent Crispin
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] WG questions, Ivan Pope
• (Fwd) FW: [wg-c] Agreement on method for consensus determinati, Siegfried Langenbach
• [wg-c] New TLDs, Mark Measday
• [wg-c] Re: [IFWP] Javier, what are you doing?, Jonathan Weinberg
• Oops -- [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Re: Oops --, Milton Mueller
  • Re: Oops -- [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries, Kent Crispin
    • Re: Oops -- [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-3] Notes on new gTLD registries, Jonathan Weinberg
• [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] Compromise, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] Compromise, Christopher Ambler
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [wg-c] Re: [wg-c-1] Compromise, Milton Mueller
• [wg-c] competing models, Milton Mueller
• [wg-c] lists, Javier SOLA
• [wg-c] Proposing a Co-chair for WGC, Ivan Pope
• [wg-c] Registry-Registry Operator, Ivan Pope
• Re: [wg-c] Mailing lists, Ken Stubbs
• 2nd try: Re: [wg-c] Mailing lists, Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Consensus on having new TLDs?, Ivan Pope
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Consensus on having new TLDs?, john.c.lewis
  • Re: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Consensus on having new TLDs?, Rita M. Odin
    • Re: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Consensus on having new TLDs?, dwmaher
• [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?, Ivan Pope
  • Re: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?, Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?, Mark C. Langston
  • RE: [wg-c] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?, Javier SOLA
    • Re: [wg-c] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?, Kent Crispin
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] RE: [wg-c-1] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?, Ivan Pope
• [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Craig Simon
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Javier
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Craig Simon
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Javier SOLA
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Onno Hovers
      • [wg-c] Lists of new TLDs, Milton Mueller
      • [wg-c] Re: Lists of new TLDs, Craig Simon
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Craig Simon
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", dwmaher
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Milton Mueller
      • Geographical management of new gTLDs? (was Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus" ), Mark C. Langston
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", john.c.lewis
    • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Siegfried Langenbach
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Siegfried Langenbach
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Javier SOLA
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Javier SOLA
  • RE: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", john.c.lewis
  • Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Kevin J. Connolly
  • RE: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", Ivan Pope
  • RE: [wg-c] There is no "consensus", john.c.lewis
• [wg-c] A counterproposal, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal, Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal, Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal, dwmaher
  • Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal, Javier SOLA
    • Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal, Javier SOLA
      • Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal, Jonathan Weinberg
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] A counterproposal, Ken Stubbs
• [wg-c] definitions, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] definitions, Craig Simon
    • Re: [wg-c] definitions, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] definitions, Craig Simon
• [wg-c] Withdrawl of name from co-chair candidacy, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Withdrawl of name from co-chair candidacy, Christopher Ambler
• [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Onno Hovers
    • Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Milton Mueller
    • Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Siegfried Langenbach
      • Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Siegfried Langenbach
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, john.c.lewis
    • Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Rod Dixon
      • Re: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Milton Mueller
  • FW: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, john.c.lewis
    • Re: FW: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Milton Mueller
• RE: [wg-c] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?, Ivan Pope
  • Re: [wg-c] Next question: Which gTLDs? How many?, Rod Dixon
• [wg-c] gTLD Trademark Applications, Ivan Pope
  • Re: [wg-c] gTLD Trademark Applications, Rod Dixon
• (Fwd) FW: [wg-c] Geographically allocated names, Siegfried Langenbach
• [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Kent Crispin
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Ivan Pope
    • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, 'Kent Crispin'
    • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Javier SOLA
      • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Javier SOLA
      • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Rod Dixon
      • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Milton Mueller
    • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Rod Dixon
  • RE: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Ivan Pope
    • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Werner Staub
  • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Kevin J. Connolly
  • RE: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Neuman, Jeffrey
    • Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE, Onno Hovers
• [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting, Ken Stubbs
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting, J. William Semich
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting, Christopher Ambler
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • SV: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting, Petter Rindforth
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting, Ken Stubbs
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting, Mark C. Langston
  • [wg-c] RE: working group c meeting, Ivan Pope
    • Re: [wg-c] RE: working group c meeting, Javier
      • Re: [wg-c] RE: working group c meeting, Kent Crispin
  • RE: [wg-c] RE: working group c meeting, Ivan Pope
• [wg-c] Current list of chair candidates?, Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] Intellectual Property Rights and gTLDs (was: I/O DesignInitiates Legal Proceedings against CORE), Kevin J. Connolly
• [wg-c] Chair?, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Chair?, Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] Importance of the Registry, Ivan Pope
  • [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry, Milton Mueller
• [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry, Milton Mueller
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry, Milton Mueller
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry, Rod Dixon
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: Importance of the Registry, Jonathan Weinberg
• [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, Milton Mueller
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, john.c.lewis
    • Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, Rita M. Odin
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, Milton Mueller
  • RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, Cohen, Tod
    • RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, Dave Crocker
      • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, Mark C. Langston
    • Re[4]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, Rita M. Odin
    • Re: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, dwmaher
  • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, Rita M. Odin
  • Re[2]: [wg-c] Competition policy and gTLDs, William X. Walsh
• Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs Trial Balloon, Kevin J. Connolly
• [wg-c] WG Chair Poll, Kevin J. Connolly
• [wg-c] Let's work on..., Javier SOLA
  • Re: [wg-c] Let's work on..., Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Let's work on..., Mark C. Langston
    • Re: [wg-c] Let's work on..., Javier SOLA
      • Re: [wg-c] Let's work on..., Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Let's work on..., Javier SOLA
      • Re: [wg-c] Let's work on..., Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Let's work on..., Rod Dixon
  • Re: [wg-c] Let's work on..., Onno Hovers
    • Re: [wg-c] Let's work on..., Javier SOLA
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] Let's work on..., Ivan Pope
• [wg-c] Voting procedures, Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] Voting CANNOT happen yet!, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Voting CANNOT happen yet!, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Voting CANNOT happen yet!, Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] CORE, Ken Stubbs
• [wg-c] ICANN hearings and WGC timetable, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] ICANN hearings and WGC timetable, Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] Comments received, Javier
• [wg-c] Fwd: Re: Comments received, Javier
• [wg-c] co-chair, Javier SOLA
  • Re: [wg-c] co-chair, Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] co-chair, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] co-chair, Jonathan Weinberg
    • Re: [wg-c] co-chair, Milton Mueller
    • Re: [wg-c] co-chair, Rod Dixon
      • Re: [wg-c] co-chair, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] co-chair, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] co-chair, Jonathan Weinberg
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [wg-c] Co-Chair, Christopher Ambler
• [wg-c] WG-C timetable, Milton Mueller
• [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Javier SOLA
  • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, J. William Semich
  • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Milton Mueller
    • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, J. William Semich
    • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Christopher Ambler
    • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Ken Stubbs
      • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, dwmaher
    • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Joop Teernstra
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Javier SOLA
    • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Milton Mueller
    • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Joop Teernstra
  • Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair, Kevin J. Connolly
• [wg-c] Election of a co-chair, Javier SOLA
  • Re: [wg-c] Election of a co-chair, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Election of a co-chair, Christopher Ambler
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • SV: [wg-c] Election of a co-chair, Petter Rindforth
• [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Javier SOLA
  • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
    • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Mark C. Langston
    • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Craig Simon
      • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, dwmaher
      • [wg-c] How to search consensus on new gTLDs, Werner Staub
      • Re: [wg-c] How to search consensus on new gTLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • RE: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
    • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, 'Kent Crispin'
      • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Rita M. Odin
    • Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs, Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] Technical problem with Joop posting (was: Re: wg-c Election of co-chair), Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
  • Re: [wg-c] Technical problem with Joop posting (was:WG chair), Joop Teernstra
• [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Javier SOLA
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Milton Mueller
    • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Joop Teernstra
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, dwmaher
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Siegfried Langenbach
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Daiva Tamulioniene
    • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Werner Staub
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, J. William Semich
    • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Jonathan Weinberg
    • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Kilnam Chon
      • Re: [ga] Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Randy Bush
    • Re: [ga] Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Randy Bush
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Keith Gymer
    • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Rob Hall
    • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Craig Simon
      • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Craig Simon
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Amadeu Abril i Abril
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Richard Lindsay
    • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Jonathan Weinberg
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Ivan Pope
    • RE: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Joop Teernstra
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Kevin J. Connolly
  • RE: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Neuman, Jeffrey
  • SV: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Petter Rindforth
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Rita M. Odin
  • RE: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Javier SOLA
  • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Javier SOLA
    • Re: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Christopher Ambler
• [wg-c] constituency representation, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] constituency representation, Jonathan Weinberg
• Re: [wg-c] Technical problem with Joop posting (was:WG chair), Joop Teernstra
• VB: [wg-c] Vote for Working Group Co-chair, Petter Rindforth
• [wg-c] my testimony for the house judiciary committee hearing, Ken Stubbs
• [wg-c] Question regarding chair vote deadline, Mark C. Langston
• IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should vote fornew gTLDs), Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs), Mark C. Langston
    • Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs), Kent Crispin
      • Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs), Siegfried Langenbach
  • [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Milton Mueller
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Siegfried Langenbach
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Siegfried Langenbach
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Ken Stubbs
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Onno Hovers
      • RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Milton Mueller
      • RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Milton Mueller
      • RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
• IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should votefornew gTLDs), Rita M. Odin
• [wg-c] How Many gTLDs? (was: Who should vote for new gTLDs), Javier SOLA
• [wg-c] Privacy gTLD, Javier SOLA
  • Re: [wg-c] Privacy gTLD, Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] WHAT DOES THE CHAIR DO?, Christopher Ambler
• [wg-c] Vote ended 40 minutes ago., Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] Ignore that...vote ends an 1am EDT, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Ignore that...vote ends an 1am EDT, Christopher Ambler
    • Re: [wg-c] Ignore that...vote ends an 1am EDT, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Ignore that...vote ends an 1am EDT, Christopher Ambler
• [wg-c] voting for Eva, Siegfried Langenbach
• Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should votefor new gTLDs), Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs (was:Re: [wg-c] Who should vote for new gTLDs), Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] Election results, Javier SOLA
  • Re: [wg-c] Election results, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Election results, Mark C. Langston
    • Re: [wg-c] Election results, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] Election results, Siegfried Langenbach
• [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Mark C. Langston
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, J. William Semich
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Martin B. Schwimmer
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Mark C. Langston
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Rita M. Odin
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Mark C. Langston
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Rita M. Odin
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Martin B. Schwimmer
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Rita M. Odin
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Rita M. Odin
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Rita M. Odin
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Joop Teernstra
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Mark C. Langston
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Rita M. Odin
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Milton Mueller
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Martin B. Schwimmer
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Martin B. Schwimmer
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Onno Hovers
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Joop Teernstra
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, martys
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, martys
  • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, William X. Walsh
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re[3]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, William X. Walsh
      • Re[3]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Joop Teernstra
      • Re[4]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, William X. Walsh
      • Re[3]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re[3]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
      • RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Roeland M.J. Meyer
    • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, John Charles Broomfield
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Christopher Ambler
      • [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?, Ken Stubbs
      • Re: [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?, Robert F. Connelly
      • [wg-c] Re: exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
      • RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted, Robert F. Connelly
      • RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted, William X. Walsh
      • Re[3]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted, William X. Walsh
      • RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted, Robert F. Connelly
      • RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re[6]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, William X. Walsh
      • Re: Re[6]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Ross Wm. Rader
      • Re[6]: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, Joop Teernstra
• [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?, Martin B. Schwimmer
    • Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?, Onno Hovers
      • Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?, Robert F. Connelly
    • Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?, Milton Mueller
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?, Robert F. Connelly
• [wg-c] Interests may be broader than some would like to acknowledge, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
  • [wg-c] Mutually exclusive concepts., Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] Interests may be broader than some would like to acknowledge, Milton Mueller
• [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues, dwmaher
  • Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues, Onno Hovers
    • Re: [wg-c] TM protection and Number of gTLDs must be separate issues, Milton Mueller
• [wg-c] Chartered TLDs and gTLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Chartered TLDs and gTLDs, Robert F. Connelly
• [wg-c] WG C co-chair, Eva Frölich
• [wg-c] cTLDs and TM dilution, Mark C. Langston
• [wg-c] Deadlines, Javier SOLA
  • RE: [wg-c] Deadlines, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • RE: [wg-c] Deadlines, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] Deadlines, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Deadlines, Kent Crispin
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] Deadlines, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
  • SV: [wg-c] Deadlines, Petter Rindforth
    • Re: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines, William X. Walsh
    • [wg-c] Deadlines, Javier SOLA
      • Re: [wg-c] Deadlines, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines, Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
  • RE: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines, Ivan Pope
    • [wg-c] weekly reports [was: Deadlines], Jonathan Weinberg
  • RE: [wg-c] Deadlines, Chicoine, Caroline
    • RE: [wg-c] Deadlines, Raul Echeberria
  • SV: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines, Petter Rindforth
    • Re: SV: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: SV: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines, owner-wg-c@dnso.org (by way of Jonathan Weinberg )
  • Re: [wg-c] Deadlines, owner-wg-c@dnso.org (by way of Jonathan Weinberg )
  • Re: [wg-c] Deadlines, Javier SOLA
• [wg-c] new to WG, Jim Glanz
• Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Mark C. Langston
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Mark C. Langston
      • RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • RE: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Robert F. Connelly
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, William X. Walsh
      • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Ken Stubbs
      • Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re[2]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Mark C. Langston
  • Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re[5]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, William X. Walsh
    • RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re[6]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, William X. Walsh
      • Re: Re[6]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Milton Mueller
      • Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Mark C. Langston
      • [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Mark Measday
      • RE: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • RE: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Mark Measday
      • RE: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Ross Wm. Rader
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Milton Mueller
      • RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Milton Mueller
      • Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Kent Crispin
      • Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Christopher Ambler
      • RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Joop Teernstra
      • RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, A.M. Rutkowski
    • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: IP/TM Concerns & New GTLDs, Javier SOLA
• RE: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Neuman, Jeffrey
  • RE: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Robert F. Connelly
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Rita M. Odin
    • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Mark Measday
    • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Martin B. Schwimmer
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Mark Measday
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Rod Dixon
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Rita M. Odin
  • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, owner-wg-c@dnso.org (by way of Jonathan Weinberg )
  • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Anthony Lupo
  • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Rita M. Odin
  • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Milton Mueller
    • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Martin B. Schwimmer
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Joop Teernstra
    • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Mark Measday
    • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Keith Gymer
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Mark Measday
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Keith Gymer
      • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
    • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Mark Measday
  • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, KathrynKL
    • Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Martin B. Schwimmer
• RE: [wg-c] weekly reports [was: Deadlines], Ivan Pope
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] weekly reports [was: Deadlines], Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
• [wg-c] Eureka?, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Jonathan Weinberg
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Martin B. Schwimmer
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Robert F. Connelly
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Rod Dixon
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Name.Space
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Joop Teernstra
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • [wg-c] Private TLDs, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Private TLDs, John Charles Broomfield
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Private TLDs, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] Private TLDs, pg@name-space.com
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Javier SOLA
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re[3]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
      • RE: Re[3]: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Jean-Michel Becar
    • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
    • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Joop Teernstra
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • [wg-c] ICANN as a private entity (was:Eureka?), Joop Teernstra
  • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Javier SOLA
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Javier SOLA
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, dwmaher
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ken Stubbs
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ken Stubbs
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
      • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ken Stubbs
      • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ken Stubbs
      • Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ken Stubbs
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, dwmaher
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, dwmaher
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, dwmaher
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, dwmaher
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ken Stubbs
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, dwmaher
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, dwmaher
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, dwmaher
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, dwmaher
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Robert F. Connelly
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Javier
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Kent Crispin
      • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
    • RE: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, A.M. Rutkowski
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Joop Teernstra
  • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
  • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
    • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, Christopher Ambler
    • RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
    • Re: [wg-c] Eureka?, Milton Mueller
  • Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?, William X. Walsh
• Reposted for Rod Dixon: Re: [wg-c] Deadlines, Jonathan Weinberg
• Reposted for Rod Dixon: Re: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines, Jonathan Weinberg
• Reposted for Rod Dixon: Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs, Jonathan Weinberg
• [wg-c] More on the property status of TLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] More on the property status of TLDs, Rod Dixon
• [wg-c] Setting a bad example, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Setting a bad example, Martin B. Schwimmer
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Setting a bad example, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] Setting a bad example, Mark C. Langston
      • Re: [wg-c] Setting a bad example, Rod Dixon
• [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution, Milton Mueller
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution, Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
    • Re: [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution, Joop Teernstra
    • Re: [wg-c] Cartesian rationalism v. Internet evolution, Milton Mueller
• [wg-c] FWD: New Domain Names, DNSO Webmaster
• [wg-c] "Public" resources, Milton Mueller
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Milton Mueller
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources, William X. Walsh
  • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Christopher Ambler
    • Re[4]: [wg-c] "Public" resources, William X. Walsh
  • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Ross Wm. Rader
  • Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Ross Wm. Rader
    • RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Kevin J. Connolly
    • RE: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Roeland M.J. Meyer
    • Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources, Joop Teernstra
  • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply, Anthony Lupo
    • Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply, Milton Mueller
      • RE: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply, William X. Walsh
      • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply, Christopher Ambler
  • Re[4]: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply, William X. Walsh
• RE: [wg-c] Mutually exclusive concepts., Robert F. Connelly
• [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs, Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
  • Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs, A.M. Rutkowski
    • Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs, Milton Mueller
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs, Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
    • Re: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs, Christopher Ambler
    • RE: [wg-c] Faisability question about so called "brand" gTLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
• [wg-c] Taxonimies and Chartered TLDs, Name.Space
  • Re: [wg-c] Taxonimies and Chartered TLDs, Christopher Ambler
• [wg-c] Proposal writing, William X. Walsh
• [wg-c] Straw Vote, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, A.M. Rutkowski
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Christopher Ambler
  • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, dwmaher
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Siegfried Langenbach
    • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Paul Stahura
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, pg@name-space.com
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Richard Lindsay
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Hal Lubsen
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Craig Simon
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Kevin J. Connolly
  • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Jean-Michel Becar
  • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
    • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Rod Dixon
      • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Jean-Michel Becar
  • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Cohen, Tod
    • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Robert F. Connelly
  • [wg-c] straw vote, Joop Teernstra
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, rogerc
    • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Rita M. Odin
    • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, A.M. Rutkowski
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote, William X. Walsh
  • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
    • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Kent Crispin
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Robert F. Connelly
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Jonathan Weinberg
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, purpose and validity, Robert F. Connelly
      • [wg-c] missing point, A.M. Rutkowski
      • RE: [wg-c] missing point, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Cohen, Tod
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Rita M. Odin
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote, William X. Walsh
    • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, getting far afield from the original question., Robert F. Connelly
  • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Martin B. Schwimmer
  • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
    • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, J. William Semich
      • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote, William X. Walsh
      • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Robert F. Connelly
      • [wg-c] The reason for new gTLDs, Dave Crocker
    • [wg-c] Why gTLDs., Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, A.M. Rutkowski
  • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
    • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Dave Crocker
    • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Milton Mueller
      • [wg-c] maximums, Dave Crocker
  • [wg-c] Straw Vote, John Charles Broomfield
    • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, John Charles Broomfield
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Milton Mueller
      • Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote, John Charles Broomfield
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote, William X. Walsh
      • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote, John Charles Broomfield
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote, William X. Walsh
  • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Rita M. Odin
    • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Straw Vote, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re[4]: [wg-c] Straw Vote, William X. Walsh
      • [wg-c] Whois, Dave Crocker
  • Re[4]: [wg-c] Straw Vote, William X. Walsh
  • SV: [wg-c] Straw Vote, Petter Rindforth
  • RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote, john.c.lewis
  • [wg-c] Straw vote, Petter Rindforth
• [wg-c] Points to consider regarding new gTLDs, pg@name-space.com
• [wg-c] Gotta love it..., Christopher Ambler
• [wg-c] maybe we could change our communications a bit... and be more productive at the same time, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
  • Re: [wg-c] maybe we could change our communications a bit... and be more pro ductive at the same time, Siegfried Langenbach
    • Re: [wg-c] maybe we could change our communications a bit... and be more pro ductive at the same time, Jonathan Weinberg
• Confusing the DNS (was: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote), Dave Crocker
  • RE: Confusing the DNS (was: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote), Roeland M.J. Meyer
    • RE: Confusing the DNS (was: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote), Dave Crocker
      • RE: Confusing the DNS (was: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote), Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • RE: Confusing the DNS (was: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote), Dave Crocker
• [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Ken Stubbs
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, A.M. Rutkowski
    • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Ken Stubbs
      • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Christopher Ambler
      • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, A.M. Rutkowski
    • [wg-c] Public Trust, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Robert F. Connelly
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, A.M. Rutkowski
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, A.M. Rutkowski
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, A.M. Rutkowski
    • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Ken Stubbs
      • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, A.M. Rutkowski
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, William X. Walsh
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, William X. Walsh
    • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, John Charles Broomfield
      • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, A.M. Rutkowski
      • [wg-c] merging naming systems, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Ross Wm. Rader
    • RE: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Roeland M.J. Meyer
      • [wg-c] domain leasing, Dave Crocker
      • Re: [wg-c] domain leasing, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] domain leasing, Joop Teernstra
      • Re: [wg-c] domain leasing, Dave Crocker
      • Re: [wg-c] domain leasing, Joop Teernstra
      • Re: [wg-c] domain leasing, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Ross Wm. Rader
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Ross Wm. Rader
    • Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Kent Crispin
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, William X. Walsh
      • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Kent Crispin
      • Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, William X. Walsh
  • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Ross Wm. Rader
  • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Ross Wm. Rader
  • Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Ross Wm. Rader
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Kevin J. Connolly
    • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, A.M. Rutkowski
      • [wg-c] Public trust?, Dave Crocker
      • Re: [wg-c] Public trust?, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: RE: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll, Rit