[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] With apologies, Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs

To: "Chris Burton" <chris@fatlarry.karoo.co.uk>, "Kent Crispin" <kent@songbird.com>
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] With apologies, Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:07:30 -0700
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <14690.990915@fatlarry.karoo.co.uk>
Reply-To: <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> The public needs 'new gTLDs' for the simple fact that all the
> .com/.net/.org/.co.uk etc domains will be gone soon and there will be
> non left for 'the general' public to register

This is news to me and probably to some of the others. Could you please
elaborate?

References:
- Re[2]: [wg-c] With apologies, Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
  - From: Chris Burton <chris@fatlarry.karoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] Re: cherry picking
Next by Date: RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
Prev by thread: Re[2]: [wg-c] With apologies, Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
Next by thread: Re: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread