[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
Wrong, this was a condition within the context. I have certainly stated
it numerous times, as have others.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On
> Behalf Of Dave
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 8:54 AM
> To: Milton Mueller
> Cc: Paul Garrin; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
> At 07:13 AM 9/14/99 , Milton Mueller wrote:
> >Just want to clarify that for many of us, support of the
> 6-10 gTLD compromise
> >depends on there being 6-10 new registries authorized; i.e.,
> one for each
> That is a contingency that was not stated by anyone, so the
> presumtion is
> that it is a contigency that you are adding for YOUR support.
> Dave Crocker Tel: +1
> 408 246 8253
> Brandenburg Consulting Fax: +1
> 408 273 6464
> 675 Spruce Drive
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA