[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder
To J. Weinberg -- thanks for the ping.
I vote for Option 2.
> >QUESTION ONE: HOW MANY NEW gTLDS, AND HOW FAST?
> >Option 1: Without regard to whether it would be desirable to have many
> >gTLDs in the long term, ICANN should proceed now by adding only a few, and
> >then pausing for evaluation. Only after assessing the results should it
> >initiate any action to add more.
> >Option 2: ICANN should implement a plan contemplating the authorization
> >of many new gTLDs over the next few years. (Example: ICANN might plan to
> >authorize up to 10-12 new registries, each operating 1-3 new gTLDs, each
> >year, for a period of five years; each year's authorizations would be
> >staggered over the course of the year.) This option would place the
> >burden on opponents, if evidence comes in demonstrating that additional
> >new gTLDs are a bad idea or that the rollout is too fast, to bring that
> >evidence to ICANN's attention and call for a halt or a slowdown.