[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting

To: "'William X. Walsh'" <william@dso.net>, "'Eric Brunner'" <brunner@world.std.com>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 16:18:14 -0800
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>, <cambler@iodesign.com>, <mueller@syr.edu>
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.991106122242.william@dso.net>
Reply-To: <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> William X. Walsh
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 1999 12:23 PM
>
> On 06-Nov-99 Eric Brunner wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Moving forward does not mean rounding up all the strays and
> pacifying

> You assumed because
> someone decides it is not worth answering your rather
> creative and outlandish
> challenges that they are conceding to you.
>
> That is not the case at all.

Amen brother Walsh. Let us not also forget the breakdown of ass-u-me.
Methinks that friend Eric presumes too much.

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  - From: "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Next by Date: RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread