[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal

To: "A.M. Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com>, John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 22:00:01 -0400
Cc: weinberg@mail.msen.com, wg-c@dnso.org
Organization: TUCOWS.com Inc.
References: <4.2.0.58.19990901212932.00ae1e60@mail.netmagic.com>
Reply-To: ross@ebarn.com
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


> 
> The Internet DNS is a distributed database.  Operationally
> and technically, the distinction among TLDs is irrelevant -
> which is what ICANN is supposed to confine itself to, and
> what I expect a court will consider on review.

Unfortunately it is very relevant - all of the current TLDs are buttressed
by existing process that eases the implementation of new TLDs. gTLDs do not
have the benefit of this structure, which is why I say again, this is why
are we here...

-RWR

--
Ross Wm. Rader
Director, eCommerce
TUCOWS.com Inc.
t. 416.239.9095 x 335
f. 416.239.8409

References:
- Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
  - From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread