[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.

To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 17:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19991120104713.00ad31f0@mail.bayarea.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


On 20-Nov-99 Dave Crocker wrote:
> At 09:41 AM 11/20/1999 , Robert F. Connelly wrote:
> 
>>Dear Kent:  As I have said several times, in case for-profit registries 
>>are permitted, then there needs to be a facility such as a public 
>>utilities commission to oversee pricing, profits, salaries of officers,
>>etc.
> 
> Bob,
> 
> NSI has been subject to just such oversight, even tested in court, but
> the 
> real end-user protection has been minimal (at best.)
> 
> What will make the new oversight better?
> 

Has NSI ever tried to gouge a customer on a renewal?  Didn't think so.

--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in?
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Possible solution to lock in? For Profit registries.
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] non/for-profit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread