[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
I agree. Let's get on with it!
Personal note to Roeland: "even a micron will do." micron is not
available in .com, .net, .org. This is just to lighten the neverending
drudgery of this process.
From: Roeland M.J. Meyer <email@example.com>
To: Milton Mueller <firstname.lastname@example.org>; email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Ross Wm. Rader <email@example.com>; Kevin J. Connolly <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>;
Date: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
>I might remind you that dead-lock ALSO favors an incumbent.The
>difference is that, a test-bed is a process which comes to a conclusion
>at a certain predictable point, a dead-lock is non-deterministic. It can
>last virtually forever and has lasted over three years. Personally, I'm
>getting bored with the dead-lock and would like to see some progress,
>even a micron would do.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
>> Milton Mueller
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 7:19 AM
>> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Cc: Ross Wm. Rader; Kevin J. Connolly; email@example.com
>> Subject: Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
>> I enthusiastically agree with Werner.
>> Werner Staub wrote:
>> > That being said, I also used to believe in testbeds as a way
>> > to promote progress and competition. Only from experience did
>> > I learn that paradoxically they serve inertia and the dominant
>> > player.