[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments

To: "Milton Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu>, <wg-c@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:19:50 -0800
References: <3.0.3.32.19991110225321.053462f4@msen.com> <19991110222730.J5983@songbird.com> <382B4422.4E5A0377@syr.edu>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

I find I agree with Milton on this issue and support his proposal.

--
Christopher Ambler
Personal Opinion Only, of course
This address belongs to a resident of the State of Washington
who does not wish to receive any unsolicited commercial email

References:
- [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Milton Mueller
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
- Re: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Milton Mueller
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments
Prev by thread: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread