[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
>It seems to me that starting with the other CORE 7 minus .web as shared
>gTLD is stork-like and not fair (and .arts is claimed anyway, isn't
>it?). If you want to talk about publicly vetted suggestions for new
>TLDs, Javier, .web is it. And not because of Chris Ambler's "branding,"
>but because it's a generic term that resonates globally.
This is a good definition, a global term. But, why do you think it makes it
non-acceptable. Should we not look for terms of this type?
Remember that the reason why CORE decided to go for those 7 gTLD was
because they were the best the IAHC process could come out with after long
public consultation. As any other gTLD, they do not belong to anybody, not
to CORE, not to anybody else.