[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do

To: <mueller@syr.edu>, "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 10:29:46 -0700
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
References: <199908261600.MAA14719@manta.outremer.com> <4.2.0.58.19990826100311.00a5a600@shell2.bayarea.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> However the fact that US$9 is still 2-9 times too
> high makes clear that that effect is small, as does the failure to get NSI
> to change its dispute policy.

No, it's not. It's 3 times too low. I would pay $27 per year for a .com,
and $30 per year for a .net, personally. Something is worth exactly
what someone is willing to pay for it. If you don't like it, buy something
else.

Christopher

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread