[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
From: "'Kent Crispin'" <kent@songbird.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 08:05:36 -0700
In-Reply-To: <A11CBC3C987DD211BD2A00A0C94357BFA410C9@human.netnames.net>; from Ivan Pope on Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 03:51:58PM +0100
Mail-Followup-To: wg-c@dnso.org
References: <A11CBC3C987DD211BD2A00A0C94357BFA410C9@human.netnames.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 03:51:58PM +0100, Ivan Pope wrote:
> 
> Or maybe we could ask: should this Working Group be proposing a set of gTLDs
> which are specifically claimed as Trademarks by another organisation?

If they in some way grant ICANN control over the TM, sure.  As I
said, my proposal of the CORE names is entirely dependent on that
happening.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain

References:
- RE: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  - From: Ivan Pope <ivan@netnames.com>
- RE: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
  - From: Ivan Pope <ivan@netnames.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
Next by Date: RE: [wg-c] There is no "consensus"
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] I/O Design Initiates Legal Proceedings against CORE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread