[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] registry contracts

To: Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 13:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, "Chicoine, Caroline" <chicoinc@PeperMartin.com>
In-Reply-To: <199911151332.IAA13182@world.std.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


On 15-Nov-99 Eric Brunner wrote:
> Caroline,
> 
> 
> One issue with the for-profit model is the probability of consolidation.
> 

Contractual regulation #1
"No organization shall have direct or indirect control via acquisitions,
subsidiaries, etc, over more than xx TLD registries."

Next issue?

--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
  - From: Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Discharging employees no longer needed after loss of contract. (Former thread "registry contracts".)
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
Prev by thread: [wg-c] Discharging employees no longer needed after loss of contract. (Formerthread "registry contracts".)
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] registry contracts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread