[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do

To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>, "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 12:00:26 -0700
Cc: <mueller@syr.edu>, <wg-c@dnso.org>
References: <199908261600.MAA14719@manta.outremer.com><4.2.0.58.19990826100311.00a5a600@shell2.bayarea.net> <4.2.0.58.19990826103607.00a8daa0@shell2.bayarea.net> <001a01beeff0$fd920fb0$7bfe3b9d@redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <038101beeff3$7ba11c00$7f4888cf@idirect.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> As one of their customers, I have every right to do so and it most
> definitely *is* my business.

Yes, as one of their customers. Not as a member of WG-C, where it
is not relevant nor possible.

But as one of their customers myself, I'll stand with you on many
counts.

You've made my point.

Christopher

References:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by Date: RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by thread: RE: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread