[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do

To: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:48:40 -0400
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
References: <199908261600.MAA14719@manta.outremer.com><4.2.0.58.19990826100311.00a5a600@shell2.bayarea.net><4.2.0.58.19990826103607.00a8daa0@shell2.bayarea.net><4.2.0.58.19990826105840.00ac47d0@shell2.bayarea.net> <4.2.0.58.19990826112926.00a92f00@shell2.bayarea.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

>
> the relevance to this list pertains to meta-issues of registry models, at
> the least.
>

True.

-RWR

References:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread