[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
At 02:59 PM 9/28/1999 , John Charles Broomfield wrote:
>Come on Dave, you expect us to read and understand the new
>agreements/amendments, discuss them on this list, listen to the feedback,
Ahhh. NOW I understand the problem.
No. I do not expect us to treat the latest event as yet-another reason to
The goal should be to focus on a reasonable set of first-steps for
introducing new names and registries. The goal does not require focusing on
other issues, such as the intricacies of the NSI-related agreements.
Yes, there are "easy" reasons to feel that such a distraction is
justified. But easy does not mean good or right. Especially when they are
held against the damage of yet-more delay.
In fact the ready concurrence about further delay strongly suggests the
detached role most participants really have in this drama.
Dave Crocker Tel: +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting Fax: +1 408 273 6464
675 Spruce Drive <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>