[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[wg-c] Re: working group c meeting



hello ivan.
i am not ducking your question but this is an item along with some other
brought up recently which we could better explore & "vet" out  in a conf
call (we could
"minute"  the call & post to the list  if members wished as well)
what about the idea of considering  a conf call for the wg and hashing out
some of these issues. i am on a plane right now and unable to fwd this
message to the wg... would you fwd the message please and see if we can get
some comments from the group.

thanks

ken
i believe core would assist on subsidizing the call as long as wg  members
felt comfortable with that. (if any company,group, or individual wants to
kick in to help defray the cost thats great with me too !!!)

-----Original Message-----
From: Ivan Pope <ivan@netnames.com>
To: 'Ken Stubbs' <kstubbs@dninet.net>
Date: Monday, July 19, 1999 7:05 AM
Subject: RE: gTLD Trademark Applications


>Well, Javier proposed that the CORE/POC seven names be proposed to the DNSO
>as the first set of gTLDs. And I said I thought that CORE had applied for
>Trademarks on them (in other words, making them even more a CORE set of
>names). But no-one seems to know if CORE has, so I thought we should
clarify
>the situation.
>So I asked you. It's a Working Group and we are addressing the question.
>Chris Ambler is quick to assert his claims on .web, for example, which as a
>bearing.
>So, I hope you can help us.
>Thanks,
>Ivan
>
>> what bearing does it have on the working group ivan ?
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ivan Pope <ivan@netnames.com>
>> To: 'Ken Stubbs' <kstubbs@dninet.net>
>> Cc: 'wg-c@dnso.org' <wg-c@dnso.org>
>> Date: Monday, July 19, 1999 5:24 AM
>> Subject: gTLD Trademark Applications
>>
>>
>> >Ken,
>> >It has been suggested (by me) that CORE has applied for
>> Trademarks on the
>> >CORE/POC 'seven' gTLDs. I am sure I read this recently.
>> >As this has a lot of bearing on the Working Group, could you
>> clarify the
>> >situation. Namely, has CORE or does CORE intend to apply for
>> Trademarks on
>> >any gTLDs?
>> >Thanks,
>> >Ivan
>> >
>>
>