[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
On 24 July 1999, "Ken Stubbs" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>it is truly a sad shame that more efforts here appear to be oriented towards
>trying to appoint and defend "chair" & "co-chair" positions of this
>working group than towards the achieving specific mandate of this group.
>as support to this position i would like to point out that of the last 41
>postings to this list , 37 have been in regards to the "chair discussion".
>this is, to say the least, NOT GOOD !!
>you know it might be best to just eliminate the chair position on these
>working groups and have the group appoint a spokesman whose job it is to
>present the consensus report for each group. i also strongly recommend that
>minority positions be allowed to place into the written record along with
>the consensus reports thier respective objections or concerns.
>i feel that a responsible group should be able to appoint a spokesman to
>present both position without unecessary petty bickering. hopefully someone
>else might consider this line of reasoning rational...
>could i possibly have a humm.... on this
Mark C. Langston Let your voice be heard:
Systems Admin http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA http://www.dnso.org