RE: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines

[Ivan Pope <ivan@netnames.com>]

Elisabeth and all,
I agree - more co-ordination and reporting needed. I would like to see more
shepherding of the process and reporting of progress by the two chairs. 
I would also like to hear from the co-chairs as to what they think their
role and responsibilities are and how we can actually get some progress
here.
That doesn't mean I don't think we are making progress - I think there is a
lot of very valid discussion going on. 
I would encourage those who are on the list lurking to make their views
known.
Cheers,
Ivan

Ivan Pope
NetNames
Managing Your Internet Identity

http://www.netnames.com
180-182 Tottenham Court Road
London, W1P 9LE
+44 (0)171 291 3900 
+44 (0)468 625546 Mobile
+44 (0)171 291 3939 (Fax)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE [mailto:Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr]
> Sent: 03 August 1999 08:53
> To: javier@aui.es; petter.rindforth@enderborg.se; wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines
> 
> 
> Petter Rindforth wrote:
> > 
> > Javier and all others, I fully agree that we have to set 
> > a new deadline although I am not sure that September 7th 
> > is enough. We will more likely need until September 30.
> > 
> > I am convinced that we will be able to present a report 
> > by the end of September if only we could be a little more 
> > organized in our discussions and stop jumping from subject 
> > to subject, spending a lot of time with personal comments 
> > on single participants in this working group. We are here 
> > together, trying to solve some tricky problems and 
> > to deliver a serious report/recommendation. Right?
> > 
> ==> Petter,
> 
>     Thank you very much for reminding us that some organization
>     is needed.
>     It was suggested by somebody that Weekly Reports (synthesis,
>     summary) are needed from Working Groups.
>     Could somebody (2 persons ? 3 ?) from WG-C write a brief 
>     report (adding, when necessary, URLs to some contributions 
>     to this list, which is archived 
>     on http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/)  ?
>     Having that for the end of this week would be appreciated, then
>     we could continue with weekly updates.
> 
>     Elisabeth Porteneuve
> 
> > Being an IP/IT Lawyer, a trademark owner and a domain name 
> > holder, I wish to point out that we, the accused "TM people" 
> > are not against the addition of new gTLDs as such, 
> > what we say is: Be careful, go slow and make sure that 
> > before creating any new problems there is a speedy and 
> > effective dispute resolution process, a system for protecting 
> > famous and well-known trademarks across all gTLDs and 
> > an easy and cost-effective system for obtaining full 
> > contact information. The addition of new gTLDs must be made 
> > in a very controlled manner, and that's why it has to be 
> > just a few to begin with.
> > 
> > // Petter Rindforth
> > 
> > 
> > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > Från: Javier SOLA <javier@aui.es>
> > Till: wg-c@dnso.org <wg-c@dnso.org>
> > Datum: den 2 augusti 1999 19:41
> > Ämne: [wg-c] Deadlines
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > >WG C,
> > >
> > >It is clear that we will have problems meeting our August 
> 9th deadline for
> > >the three reports that we are supposed to produce. We need 
> to figure out
> > >another deadline for the working group reports.
> > >
> > >At this point we are just starting the real discussion, 
> and we should give
> > >this at least a couple of weeks before we start drafting, 
> and then at least
> > >another couple of weeks for drafting and figuring out 
> consensus on the
> > >reports. I would propose that we set a new deadline for 
> the beginning of
> > >September.
> > >
> > >I would like to propose Tuesday September 7th.
> > >
> > >Any other ideas ?
> > >
> > >Javier
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
>