[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?

To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 19:29:05 -0700
References: <199908130029.UAA01015@manta.outremer.com> <023501bee521$7096b900$7bfe3b9d@redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <031a01bee531$0b824ec0$02000003@kenstubbs>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

I stand by each and every word I've posted. I'm
flattered that someone would go to the trouble to
collect them. 

I'd go into why I believe that Ken felt the need for
such a post, but I'm sure it'll be very apparent
very soon.

If the DNSO accomplishes anything except the
pre-planned script laid out for it months ago, I'll
be very surprised. I'm just along for the ride. You
can add this paragraph to the list, if you like.

Christopher

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?
  - From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  - From: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
- [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?
  - From: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
Prev by thread: [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] exactly what are we trying to accomplish here ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread