[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Eureka?

To: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>, wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 19:54:16 +1200
In-Reply-To: <19990805224710.A15276@songbird.com>
References: <37A9ABC5.9C750A62@syr.edu><s7a7fd38.059@gw1.rspab.com><3.0.3.32.19990804143431.05415d18@mail.msen.com><19990804222530.C896@songbird.com><37A9ABC5.9C750A62@syr.edu>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 10:47 PM 5/08/1999 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote:

>In particular, of course, I don't believe ICANN should enable
>exclusive registries.  Nor do I think that registries should pick
>their TLDs -- I think that there should be many registries, but that
>they should  bid to run TLDs with fixed term renewable contracts. 
>
2 Questions:

What is the rationale for that?  (inquiring minds...)

What length of term are you thinking of?  Ten years?




--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  , bootstrap  of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
- [wg-c] Eureka?
  - From: "Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
- Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread