Re: [wg-c] registry contracts & legal status of ...

[Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>]

Milt,

> In short, I am attacking the relevance of the whole distinction.

If, as the USG's colored papers observe, both positions on the subject of
registry status, for- and non-profit, have considerable merit, how is it
that one now has none, and not to put too fine a point on it, how is it
that there never were two positions in the first place?

Is self-referential assertion an adequate means of proof?

---

If the Moldavians decide to sell liver pills, or Syracuse University
decides to resurect the Soviet Politburo as a military exercise in .edu,
so what?

Take some advice and bag big_title@politburo.su.edu ASAP.

Anyway, Mr. Hooker has competition from Mssrs. Liner and Sinker, who are
about to enter the on-line emergency medicine and optometry games, trading
in .AU (pronounced "OW") and .IE (pronounced "EYEE"), respectively.

---

Thanks for the heads up that some of the claims made in the name of consumers
are deceptive!

Cheers,
Eric