RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

... and I thought I was the only one that said "Huh?"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> Christopher Ambler
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 12:20 PM
> To: wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
> 
> 
> I'm afraid I have no idea what you just said. Would you be so
> kind as to rephrase it in smaller words for me?
> 
> --
> Christopher Ambler
> Personal Opinion Only, of course
> This address belongs to a resident of the State of Washington
> who does not wish to receive any unsolicited commercial email
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eric Brunner" <brunner@world.std.com>
> To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 11:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
> 
> 
> > Christopher,
> > 
> > As you are not able to show unqualified acceptance of 6-10, 
> as a member
> > of the non-consenting party (apparently enjoying leadership 
> defection),
> > why is your opposition to "acquienscence" on some "least 
> squares error"
> > basis (no position paper precluded non-profit, or shared 
> for that matter,
> > registry forms) useful?
> > 
> > Doesn't the same principle require you to reject 6-10 as well?
> > 
> > Was there some inobvious way to read B so that if the 
> rollout of 500 
> > new gTLDs failed, and the a priori confinement of trademark to only
> > those new gTLDs where the invisible hand of the market found rights
> > to marks favorable also failed, that non-profit forms could only be
> > deployed subsequent to, or contemporanious with, for-profit forms?
> > 
> > I understand your point that your ethnicity comes first, or at least
> > before Indians, not a unique view to be sure, but your for-profit
> > registry model has to be in the first cohort or none shall 
> be deployed?
> > 
> > I gues this means we'll have to let Microsoft have first 
> crack at the
> > game, even if registration is automatic, and free (a la IE).
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Eric
> > 
>