[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting

To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 18:44:04 -0800
References: <199911052140.RAA19719@manta.outremer.com> <4.2.0.58.19991106105318.00b171b0@teal.sni.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> Regarding the present issue, why now learn from our very serious mistakes 
> and have *no more for-profit registries*;-)

No more? So NSI gets to remain a for-profit registry while all new
ones may not? I believe that's spelled "antitrust."

Christopher

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  - From: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  - From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Next by Date: RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread