Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1

["A.M. Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com>]

Two questions on substance:

> *do* have "rough consensus on having an
> evaluation period after the
> deployment of a first few gTLDs."  Option 2, as I drafted it,
> didn't
> include an evaluation period at all.  It contemplated an orderly,
> phased

Exactly what would be evaluated?  It seems relevant to the
proposition,



> that persons who believed that the data coming
> in showed the planned
> rollout to be too fast or too extensive could bring their concerns to
> ICANN
> at any time.  The point is important, I think, because a plan
> calling for
> deployment of a "few" gTLDs followed by an "evaluation
> period" gives a
> specific decisional pressure point to the folks who believe that
> ICANN
> ought to deploy only a few new gTLDs and then stop.

Exactly what does it mean to be "too fast or extensive?"
We're dealing with competition in a market, right?

What would be evaluated at that "pressure point?"


--tony