[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-c] Straw Vote
Marilyn and Rita have spoken eloquently and I agree with their views on
Option 1 with the preconditions. It is important that we move forward with
the basic underlying policies in place as opposed to the rush to new
From: Rita M. Odin [mailto:OdinR@arentfox.com]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 1999 2:15 PM
To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Straw Vote
>>> Jonathan Weinberg <firstname.lastname@example.org> 08/12 4:52 PM
>QUESTION ONE: HOW MANY NEW gTLDS, AND HOW >FAST?
>Option 1: Without regard to whether it would be >desirable
to have many
>gTLDs in the long term, ICANN should proceed now by adding
>only a few, and
>then pausing for evaluation. Only after assessing the
results >should it
>initiate any action to add more.
I vote for option 1 - with the ever present caveat that no
action should be taken to add gTLDs until the following have been put into
place: (1) a universal, reliable and searchable database of contact
information for all domain name registrants; (2) a workable uniform dispute
resolution procedure; and (3) a famous name policy.
Rita M. Odin