[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
From: Onno Hovers <onno@surfer.xs4all.nl>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 10:40:23 +0200
In-Reply-To: <199907302343.QAA24532@agamemnon.home.com>
Organization: no
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

Mark C. Langston wrote:
> On 30 July 1999, "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net> wrote:
>>
>>And as to your remarks regarding the irrelevancy of DNs due to the use of
>>search engines, would you then agree to a single new TLD consisting
>>entirely of numerical addresses?  If not, why not?

> We have those already.  They're called IP addresses.
> I'm perfectly happy with IP addresses.

You can do things with domain names that you can't do with IP addresses,
like name-based virtual hosts and backup mailservers.

Regards,
-- 
Onno Hovers, onno@surfer.xs4all.nl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  - From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
  - From: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Do we need a TM law modification?
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread