[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Dave Crocker wrote:
> At 02:17 PM 9/28/1999 , John Charles Broomfield wrote:
> > Seeing that the only thing we more or less managed consensus on
> >serves nearly no purpose, and that the big roadblock to more discussions and
> >consensus building has been (IMO) lifted, I think that just giving us 3 days
> >to post drafts is somewhat premature.
> Try the other view of this event, namely that the increased clarity of the
> situation should permit us to move more decisively.
It does indeed provide us with greater clarity, however decisive movement
implies a considered course of action - something that isn't likely to occur
over a 72 hour period.
Therefore, I also support a finite postponement.
Ross Wm. Rader
t. (416) 239-9095 x 335
f. (416) 239-8409