[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do

To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 12:44:02 -0700
References: <199908261600.MAA14719@manta.outremer.com><4.2.0.58.19990826100311.00a5a600@shell2.bayarea.net><4.2.0.58.19990826103607.00a8daa0@shell2.bayarea.net> <4.2.0.58.19990826113441.00b09e60@shell2.bayarea.net> <009201beeff5$1b3fbae0$7bfe3b9d@redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <19990826124038.A21066@songbird.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> In case you haven't noticed, the IAHC process is alive and well -- 
> the names have changed, and the faces have rearranged, is all.

In my best Tom Likus voice, "Reeeeeeeeeeealy!"

Christopher

References:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] Posts by person
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread