[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
Your point is interesting. I certainly didn't get the message that I could
I do understand the other message about "what precinct" do I vote in; but we
aren't yet in a representative democracy environment... do any of those who
didn't vote, want to say whether they would have "abstained" if given the
easy option? Marilyn
From: Robert F. Connelly [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 11:51 PM
Subject: RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus
(w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
At 23:35 21-09-1999 -0400, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
>If there were 10-25 more members than voted, then I think we have a problem
>which we should discuss amongst ourselves... are we relevant? How are we
>addressing concerns of broader constituency?
Dear Marilyn: They have the alternative to vote an "abstention". Then
they would be counted.
I don't know what precinct you vote in, but if you don't vote you ain't
"It doesn't do any good to run
if you don't start on time!"
Rev. Bruce Jones