[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal
At 17:18 12-08-99 -0700, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>Unlike CORE, IOD has never claimed to be in
>charge, has never claimed to be the anointed successor of the root,
Hold her, Myrt, you're a runnin' for the pea patch!
CORE did not claim to be the anointed one. Every indication we had from
the IAHC folk was that they knew where the rocks were. We now know to our
disadvantage that they didn't know where the stream was.
>and has never claimed that its registry would be in the root by a
>certain date, changing that date as it came and went. It also has
>not chosen a TLD that was previously trademarked.
Tell me, Chris, which Trademark office now or ever in the past would
register a TLD?
"One test is worth three expert opinions!"
Ulric B. Bray