[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] Eureka?

To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>, <mueller@syr.edu>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 15:12:28 -0700
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <000401bee0fe$aaaf9020$f78ad0d8@storm3.sympatico.ca>
Reply-To: <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Ross
> Wm. Rader
> Sent: Saturday, August 07, 1999 11:00 AM

> On the other hand, Chris is making blind assumptions about the price
> movement of SLD.TLD pairs based on assumptions that exist in
> a future market
> solely
> created in his mind.

This isn't correct. His assumptions aren't "blind", his arguments have
weight because they are consistent with a basic economic theory, which
is well proven. It's called the "law of supply and demand", in case you
haven't heard about it.

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  - From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Eureka?
Next by Date: [wg-c] "Public" resources
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread