Re: [wg-c] WG Chairs

["Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>]

>>> "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com> 07/21/99 04:03PM >>>
>
>On 21 July 1999, "Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>>>>> "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com> 07/21/99 03:21PM >>>
>>>> Here, do an exercise: try to express you arguments without naming me or
>>>> anybody else for the next 24 hours. Can you?
>>
>>>Translation: Ignore the man behind the curtain!
>>
>>>I still want to know the duties and responsibilities of the chair(s).
>>
>>>Christopher
>>
>>Og say:
>>
>>http://www.ietf.org/tao.html 
>>
>>is a start.

Ooo, mailclient purchased by Induhvidual upstairs act flaky.

Og also say take look at RFC 2418.

>
>
>Mr. Connolly -
>
>1) Stop with the "og" crap.

Og much too big a fan of Dilbert to refrain from this mode when it's called-for.
 
>
>2) Provide evidence demonstrating that WG-C agreed to adopt the IETF
>processes.  

No.  Og not need no evidence.  Og wanna know: 
what other kind WG you think we got?
(Og wanna know other things too, but Kent sez be 
nice, so Og put flamethrower back in box :-)

**********************************************************************
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential
and is or may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work
product doctrine, joint defense privileges, trade secret protections,
and/or other applicable protections from disclosure.  If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this com-
munication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communi-
cation in error, please immediately notify us by calling our Help Desk
at 212-541-2000 ext.3314, or by e-mail to helpdesk@rspab.com
**********************************************************************