Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency

["William S. Lovell" <wsl@cerebalaw.com>]

Which puts you in the position of ratifying ICANN's claim to be
a policy making rather than a technical coordinating body, does
it not?

Bill Lovell

Joop Teernstra wrote:

> At 09:43 31/07/2001 -0400, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
> >A rough blanket statement of the broad objectives of the Individual
> >Registrants
> >Constituency (IRC) might be as follows:
> >
> >"Mission:  To effect and ensure the recognition, representation, and input of
> >Individual Registrants of Domain Names as bona fide stakeholders in the Domain
> >Name System (DNS), through an established and direct voice in all ICANN policy
> >formulation bodies and functions."
>
> YES to that.

--
Any terms above that are not familiar to the reader may
possibly be explained at:
"WHAT IS": http://whatis.techtarget.com/
GLOSSARY: http://www.icann.org/general/glossary.htm
Archives of posted emails on various General Assembly
mailing lists and other ICANN information can be found at:
http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html