Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

"William S. Lovell" wrote:

> I think you need to clarify by saying something like "ICANN internal
> policy formulation bodies and functions."

In deference to your savvy Bill, how about the following arrangement:

Mission:  To effect and ensure the recognition, representation, and input of
Individual Registrants of Domain Names as bona fide stakeholders in the Domain
Name System (DNS), through an established and direct voice in all policy
formulation bodies and functions of the ICANN."

I think this wording makes it pretty clear that the policy "bodies and
functions" referred to are those of the ICANN.

Sincerely,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos

>
>
> Or "bodies and functions that formulate internal ICANN policies."
>
> Although "IRC" also = "Internal Revenue Code," if the constituency
> is to be limited to natural persons, I reluctantly conclude also that the
> Individual Registrants Constituency is about the only way to go.
>
> But we also have the IDNO going -- are there two of these going
> now? Which one responds to the Board meeting concerning the
> establishment of an Individuals Constituency? Are these two in
> competition, are they the same thing, searching for a name? Are
> both to co-exist?  The numerous posts on both subjects leave a
> pretty hefty mishmash of confusion, methinks.
>
> Bill Lovell
>
> DPF wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:43:44 -0400, Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>> <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com> wrote:
>>
>> >erica wrote:
>> >
>> >> Can we move on to discuss the broad objectives of the proposed
>> constituency
>> >> and funding issues?
>> >
>> >A rough blanket statement of the broad objectives of the Individual
>> Registrants
>> >Constituency (IRC) might be as follows:
>> >
>> >"Mission:  To effect and ensure the recognition, representation, and
>> input of
>> >Individual Registrants of Domain Names as bona fide stakeholders in the
>> Domain
>> >Name System (DNS), through an established and direct voice in all ICANN
>> policy
>> >formulation bodies and functions."
>>
>> I know I shouldn't do too many "me too"posts but what Sotiris said
>> works for me.
>>
>> DPF
>> --
>> david@farrar.com
>> ICQ 29964527
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> Any terms above that are not familiar to the reader may
> possibly be explained at:
> "WHAT IS": http://whatis.techtarget.com/
> GLOSSARY: http://www.icann.org/general/glossary.htm
> Archives of posted emails on various General Assembly
> mailing lists and other ICANN information can be found at:
> http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html