Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

IMHO, Erica, Bill, DPF, Roeland and Joop, naming the things by their name 
is the easiest way to be understood. I am very glad  (my assistant asked me 
why I shouted "Great!") of Joop's response. For a long we have supported 
the DNH/O wording not to "betray" Joop effort. But obviously the word 
Registrant is the correct one.

Now, also the reason of my shout is that Registrants is

- no more individual (so we may have the support of amazon.com) yet we may 
additionally qualify them by type of problem (example: when you register a 
single DN you relate through a graphic interface, when you register 
thousands you relate through a message template).

- a clear reponse. The DNSO *must* include:
   - Registrants
   - ccTLD
   - gTLD
   - Registrars

- in having Joop adopting a function related approach we separate the 
problem of registration and the problem of holdership by a small/individual 
organization. Hence we may propose both:

   - Registrant Constituancy with (as the BC) an SME and propably an 
Individual committee (DNSO/RC/I)
   - the Individual Constituency in the @large SO

I am very gral that eventually we may reach what should be a consensus 
among IDNHers.
Jefsey

On 12:38 31/07/01, DPF said:
>On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:32:16 -0700, "William S. Lovell"
><wsl@cerebalaw.com> wrote:
>
> >I've seen you and Jefsey and Steven Heath (I think) and
> >others wrestling over the name of the constituency, and
> >again I see the alphabet soup a'cookin' on the stove.  Why
> >not KISS and just call it "Registrants?"  That avoids the
> >"consumers" problem, the question of whether a registrant
> >is an owner or a holder, and a lot of others, methinks. :-)
>
>I quite like this idea - solves a lot of problems.
>
>As Joop said we could call it "Individual Registrants" or we could
>just call it "Registrants" and specify in the fine print individuals
>only.
>
>DPF
>--
>david@farrar.com
>ICQ 29964527
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html