Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency

[Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

"me too" on both of these posts.
Regards,
Joanna 


>>> As Joop said we could call it "Individual Registrants" or we could
>>> just call it "Registrants" and specify in the fine print individuals
>>> only.
>>> 
>> Lets go with this then -
>> As I understand it, it would then be necessary to specify that membership is
>> open to 'natural persons' who are domain name registrants.
> 
> Yep.  That is IMO exactly the way to do it.

On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:43:44 -0400, Sotiris Sotiropoulos
<sotiris@hermesnetwork.com> wrote:

>A rough blanket statement of the broad objectives of the Individual Registrants
>Constituency (IRC) might be as follows:
>
>"Mission:  To effect and ensure the recognition, representation, and input of
>Individual Registrants of Domain Names as bona fide stakeholders in the Domain
>Name System (DNS), through an established and direct voice in all ICANN policy
>formulation bodies and functions."

I know I shouldn't do too many "me too"posts but what Sotiris said
works for me.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html