Re: [wg-review] Re: [cctld-discuss] Comments on review of DNSOby MrPark
I do agree that ICANN must work in a multi-lingual capacity? Any other
Pilar LUQUE (ES-NIC)
Eric Dierker wrote:
> If we put the issue of money aside are we all in agreement that ICANN must
> work in a multi-lingual capacity?
> Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> > Dear Oscar,
> > the wg-review motion/voting system has poorly worked in spite of the
> > efforts of Joop Teemstra, so none of my seconded and accepted motions has
> > been voted upon.
> > I had motioned as one cause of the DNSO consensus problems the language
> > issue and proposed that no one could participate to an ICANN ML if he had
> > not at least two languages. The point was not so much about English as I
> > explained, but because it would help the people to hear, listen and may be
> > understand better each others.
> > Jefsey Morfin
> > Chair, france@large
> > At 17:12 16/01/01, Oscar A. Robles Garay wrote:
> > >I strongly support Pilar's comments, as long as we publish documents just
> > >in english we are contributing on the ICANN "language divide" which, of
> > >course, translates into poor representativeness...
> > >
> > >Oscar Robles
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
> > Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html