DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Re: [cctld-discuss] Comments on review of DNSOby MrPark

If we put the issue of money aside are we all in agreement that ICANN must
work in a multi-lingual capacity?

Jefsey Morfin wrote:

> Dear Oscar,
> the wg-review motion/voting system has poorly worked in spite of the
> efforts of Joop Teemstra, so none of my seconded and accepted motions has
> been voted upon.
> I had motioned as one cause of the DNSO consensus problems the language
> issue and proposed that no one could participate to an ICANN ML if he had
> not at least two languages. The point was not so much about English as I
> explained, but because it would help the people to hear, listen and may be
> understand better each others.
> Jefsey Morfin
> Chair, france@large
> At 17:12 16/01/01, Oscar A. Robles Garay wrote:
> >I strongly support Pilar's comments, as long as we publish documents just
> >in english we are contributing on the ICANN "language divide" which, of
> >course, translates into poor representativeness...
> >
> >Oscar Robles
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
tel;fax:(858) 571-8497
tel;work:(858) 571-8431

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>