Re: [registrars] IDN Representative

["Edmon Chung" <edmon@neteka.com>]

Hi Rob,
What is "Wrong"?
The IETF approved a proposed standard for a protocol for IDN and it
intentionally did not provide transition or migration strategies because
that was beyond a protocol standard.  The ICANN IDN committee will take the
initiative to start to consider how implementation and migration would/might
look like and address the issues.
And ok, I hear you about the use of the term "Testbed".  So I guess we
should not refer to VGRS's implementation as Testbed then is what you are
saying...?...
Edmon


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
To: "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org>
Cc: "Duane Connelly" <duane@psi-japan.co.jp>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [registrars] IDN Representative


> At 10:55 AM 1/21/03 -0500, Edmon Chung wrote:
> >Although please note that the IETF standards is only for the final
protocol
>
> Dear Edmond:
>
> WRONG!!!:-( "Testbed" is a term of the art.  We should adhere to the IETF
> definition of the word, not the misuse of the term as used by
> Verisign.  Regards, BobC
>
>
>
>