Re: [nc-org] The TF roster
I'm sorry, Cary, you're mistaken.
Let me remind you that Philip asked me to not have two
members of the gTLD constituency involved at all. It was
I, as Chair of the TF, who extended the initial invitation to
Roger to help with observations and responses to questions
about the current situation of ORG. As such, I am the person
who will determine the conditions under which we avail ourselves
of his comments and expertise.
It is, again, a simple matter of fairness. There are many
other constiteuncies that might like to have two people on
the TF, but we must be consistent in our treatment of all.
Anyone can see the archived emails, and if you want to forward
them to Roger you are free to do so. But full participation
will be restricted to one representative from each constituency.
Elisabeth, please correct the situation.
>>> Cary Karp <email@example.com> 08/16/01 02:18PM >>>
> I'm sorry if I was unclear. Roger was not invited to be a full
> participant of the task force and should be removed from the
> list. He will be asked to respond to specific issues uncovered
> by the TF as we move along. It is inappropriate to have more
> than one member from each constituency on the TF, as
> Philip made clear to us.
The letter that Philip addressed to the entire Names Council,a nd
was thus reveived by Roger, states quite clearly that he regards it
as appropriate for Roger to be invited to join the TF as an
observer. There was no suggestion that he only be asked to comment
on selected tidbits. Elisabeth's initial action was thus correct.
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:27:06 +0200
From: Philip Sheppard <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Milton Mueller <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Re: [council] NC task forces composition
Milton, for clarity;
I suggest that Cary should be the gTLD nominee to the dot org TF and
that as TF chair, you invite Roger as an observer, co-opted for his
> >>> Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr> 08/16/01 01:51PM >>>
> You are correct that Roger Cochetti was invited to join this
> group for his expertise. Just added:
> "Roger Cochetti" <email@example.com> has been added to nc-org.
> If there are other people missing on the list, please let me know.
> So far we have:
> NCDNH: Milton Mueller
> IPC: Guillermo Carey
> ccTLD: Elisabeth Porteneuve
> BC: Grant Forsyth
> gTLD: Cary Karp
> Registrars: Ken Stubbs
> gTLD: Roger Cochetti
> ISPCP: ???
> Thank you,
> > From firstname.lastname@example.org Sat Aug 4 09:18 MET 2001
> > Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 09:14:39 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
> > From: Cary Karp <email@example.com>
> > To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Subject: [nc-org] The TF roster
> > Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.email@example.com>
> > X-X-Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > It strikes me that the list of recipients of communications
> > addressed to email@example.com doesn't precisely correspond to the
> > list of TF reps that have been appointed by their constituencies.
> > This is fine by me, as I agree that the value of our work will be
> > enhanced by encouraging the input of selected individuals on the
> > basis of their ability to contribute to the discussion.
> > I note that Milton previously stated his intention to invite Roger
> > Cochetti to participate in TF activity, given Roger's expert
> > understanding of matters relating to .org.
> > Has this invitation been extended?
> > Have the constituencies that, at last notice, had yet to appoint
> > their TF reps now been heard from?
> > /Cary