<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] A Story Telling Style of History ??
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 06:28:49 -0800, William X Walsh wrote:
> On Sun, January 20, 2002, 5:37:18 AM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
>
> > In fact, I already proposed that procedural stuff be debated elsewhere.
> > This was well supported by the GA membership but ignored by the
> > former Chair.
>
> I love how you turn a few people who supported your view, in an
> illegitimate vote anyway, into "well supported by the GA Membership."
>
> Your story telling style of history is rather amusing, Patrick. Good
> for a laugh, but not to be taken seriously.
Hi William
The evidence that I am being truthful in what I say is below.
18 declared supporters and purportedly accepted by Danny.
Let's see you get 18 supporters for "no working groups" !!
Best regards
Patrick Corliss
PS Not yet 5:00 am and my last post already for today :-)
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:25:19 +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 01:33:50 EDT, Danny Younger wrote:
>
> > I have no objection to accepting the motion that you have proposed.
> > At some point our Secretariat will advise when it is ready to once more
> > support the activities of the General Assembly. Perhaps we might be
> > able to conclude a vote on this motion by early October (according to
> > the most recent timetable put forth). In the meantime, you may wish to
> > get a "sense of the GA" on this topic through a poll.
>
> Thank you for your support and your comments. By my count, there are
> 18 declared supporters for the present proposal:
>
> * Peter de Blanc
> * Roeland Meyer
> * Leah Gallegos
> * Jefsey Morfin
> * Ken Stubbs
> * William S. Lovell
> * Marilyn Cade
> * Ross Wm. Rader (for Tucows)
> * Bradley Thornton
> * Alexander Svensson
> * Michael McNulty
> * Joop Teernstra
> * Erica Roberts
> * Marc Schneiders
> * Vany Martinez
> * John C. Lewis
> * Derek Conant (with reservations)
> * Patrick Corliss (myself)
>
> I believe that we have sufficient mandate to request members to use the
> [ga-rules] mailing list to debate procedural or other administrative issues
> like websites, mailing lists, etc.
>
> > To facilitate that effort, and in response to the recommendation put forth
> > by Bill Lovell to create our own website, I have begun building such a
> > site (with an area devoted to current motions). You may visit
> > http://www.icannworld.org to see the results of my efforts over the
> > course of this weekend.
>
> I would, of course, thank both Bill Lovell and yourself, as well as Joanna
> Lane, for your kind efforts.
>
> One wonders why we cannot incorporate these initiatives into the current
> DNSO website. I see this as an issue that needs to be discussed on the
> [ga-rules] mailing list.
>
> > Clicking on the General Assembly Link will take you to the page that
> > leads you to the Straw Poll.
>
> Thank you. At least we start with the 18 names above (19 if we include
> yourself) in favour of discussing non-substantive issues on the [ga-rules]
> mailing list.
>
> I see that as sufficient mandate to encourage compliance with this motion.
>
> > Best regards,
> > Danny
>
> Best wishes
> Patrick Corliss
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001 18:52:42 +1100, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> Hi Danny
>
> Perhaps I should have read your wishy washy, doublespeak wording more
> carefully. You wrote:
>
> > > At some point our Secretariat will advise when it is ready to once more
> > > support the activities of the General Assembly. Perhaps we might be
> > > able to conclude a vote on this motion by early October (according to
> > > the most recent timetable put forth). In the meantime, you may wish to
> > > get a "sense of the GA" on this topic through a poll.
>
> The fact is that the DNSO Secretariat never had any intention of putting my
> motion to a vote. I doubt if you did either despite your misleading
heading
> "Motion Accepted".
>
> If we can't even get an internal motion to a vote of the GA, what chance do
> we have with something that has external implicatations.
>
> So can we cut the crap and just write off the GA as a farce?
>
> Best regards
> Patrick
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Corliss <patrick@quad.net.au>
> To: <DannyYounger@cs.com>
> Cc: [ga] <ga@dnso.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 3:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Motion Accepted
>
>
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 01:33:50 EDT, Danny Younger wrote:
> >
> > > I have no objection to accepting the motion that you have proposed.
> > > At some point our Secretariat will advise when it is ready to once more
> > > support the activities of the General Assembly. Perhaps we might be
> > > able to conclude a vote on this motion by early October (according to
> > > the most recent timetable put forth). In the meantime, you may wish to
> > > get a "sense of the GA" on this topic through a poll.
> >
> > Thank you for your support and your comments. By my count, there are
> > 18 declared supporters for the present proposal:
> >
> > * Peter de Blanc
> > * Roeland Meyer
> > * Leah Gallegos
> > * Jefsey Morfin
> > * Ken Stubbs
> > * William S. Lovell
> > * Marilyn Cade
> > * Ross Wm. Rader (for Tucows)
> > * Bradley Thornton
> > * Alexander Svensson
> > * Michael McNulty
> > * Joop Teernstra
> > * Erica Roberts
> > * Marc Schneiders
> > * Vany Martinez
> > * John C. Lewis
> > * Derek Conant (with reservations)
> > * Patrick Corliss (myself)
> >
> > I believe that we have sufficient mandate to request members to use the
> > [ga-rules] mailing list to debate procedural or other administrative
> > issues like websites, mailing lists, etc.
> >
> > > To facilitate that effort, and in response to the recommendation put
> > > forth
> > > by Bill Lovell to create our own website, I have begun building such a
> > > site (with an area devoted to current motions). You may visit
> > > http://www.icannworld.org to see the results of my efforts over the
> > > course of this weekend.
> >
> > I would, of course, thank both Bill Lovell and yourself, as well as Joanna
> > Lane, for your kind efforts.
> >
> > One wonders why we cannot incorporate these initiatives into the current
> > DNSO website. I see this as an issue that needs to be discussed on the
> > [ga-rules] mailing list.
> >
> > > Clicking on the General Assembly Link will take you to the page that
> > > leads you to the Straw Poll.
> >
> > Thank you. At least we start with the 18 names above (19 if we include
> > yourself) in favour of discussing non-substantive issues on the [ga-rules]
> > mailing list.
> >
> > I see that as sufficient mandate to encourage compliance with this motion.
> >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Danny
> >
> > Best wishes
> > Patrick Corliss
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|