Re: [ga] Letter from ICANN to New.net
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, at 16:52 [=GMT-0700], Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 07:43:37PM -0400, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> > Kent Crispin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 02:12:22PM -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> > > > In it, New.net does not argue for multiple roots systems,
> > >
> > > What they argue really isn't very important -- they are so full of hype
> > > you can't tell what they are talking about anyway. What matters is what
> > > they *do*, and they have *done* is create an alternate root.
> > Actually, it's more of an enhancement to the existing root... like an
> > amplification, if you will.
> You are just parroting hype. The fact is that new.net has conflicting
> TLDs already.
Conflicting TLDs? New.net? With whom? With your ICANN? Sure with some
'toyroots'. But they don't matter according to you, do they? Why are
you disturbed then? ICANN will create the conflicting TLDs. See .biz.
More to follow?
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html