Re: [ga] the NC takes the next step
On 7 Jun 2001, at 7:33, DPF wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:07:17 -0400, you wrote:
> >Regardless of the representation within a ccTLD country or region, do we
> >or anyone outside that region have a right to interfere?
> >In the end, if a country is at odds with a cctLD manager, it should be up
> >to them to work it out and not ICANN, an SO organization or any other
> >outside force. To do anything else puts ICANN in a political policy
> >position which is completely out of line.
> Eventually if no agreement can be reached someone has to make a
> decision and that is currently DOC and IANA. There does need to be
> some redelegation mechanism IMO.
If ICANN/DoC interferes with a ccTLD, it then becomes a policy body
that supersedes sovereignty of a nation or region. Governments and
their citizens often have disagreements and even civil war. By what
right does another government or a private corporation make decisions
concerning interaction between other governments and their citizens?
ICANN has already overstepped its authority, IMO, with the UDRP in
determining the fate of a domain name holder in one country who is
challenged by a corporation in another country regardless of those
national laws. This is going much too far for a technical coordinating
> ICQ 29964527
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html