Re: [ga] Membership roll versus discussion lists

[Eric Weisberg <weisberg@texoma.net>]

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> >Would the cybervoting/membership list have discussions?  How else could there
> be

> >motions, seconds and debate of propositions?  Would it
> >have a different function than the "cyberdiscussion" list?
>
> This remains to be debated.....my thought would be that the "cybervoting"
> list  would not be a list at all, but a membership roll, with email only
> used for sending out ballots.
>
> The process required to agree upon the text of those ballots then becomes
> the next piece of the puzzle to get agreement about.

Do you propose an open membership (self-selection, no membership criteria) for
the voting list?