ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-roots]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-roots] Capture and Diversion


Yes.


At 11:05 AM 5/2/2001 -0700, Simon Higgs wrote:
>At 02:55 AM 5/3/01 +1000, you wrote:
>>On Wednesday, May 02, 2001 10:31 AM (AEST), Kristy McKee wrote:
>>
>> > IMHO this is beyond ICANN's scope as Bret mentioned ealier:  the IETF is
>> > the place for decisions like these to happen; therefore if we do have an
>> > opinion I recommend we direct it in their direction.
>>
>>That's an interesting observation, thank you.  If we assume that it is
>>ICANN's policy to comply with the technical standards as laid down by the
>>IETF, then this will also apply to the question of a "unique root" as
>>defined in the RFCs.
>
>Then can we all assume ICANN will fully comply with this IETF document 
>once it becomes an RFC:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-higgs-root-defs-00.txt
>
>The DNSO should be fully supporting this effort to prevent collisions 
>between roots.
>
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Simon Higgs
>
>--
>It's a feature not a bug...
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>