ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: [ga] Re: [ALSC-Forum] IcannWatch


Friday, Friday, August 17, 2001, 12:15:47 PM, Derek Conant wrote:

> You don't know what you're talking about concerning this matter.  You
> don't represent IcannWatch.  It appears that you have a problem with
> submitting comments just to be antagonistic and nonconstructive.  You
> would probably do better finding something else to do with your time. 
> You appear more in the way here than anything else.

> The point I was making concerning IcannWatch representatives not giving
> the DNSGA credit for its story and why I believe they did not was made
> clear. 

They didn't give you credit because they chose not to publish it.

Which looks like the right decision, in my opinion.

You can believe anything you want, I prefer facts and reality.

Your "one man" general assembly not withstanding, Derek, the article
was nothing but self serving drivel.  Your criticism of them for not
publishing it was out of line, and without merit.

No one agrees with you, get over it.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>