RE: [ga] MOTION: Request for a GA resolution on an IDN holders' c onstituency (IC)

[Vany Martinez <vany@sdnp.org.pa>]

Hi Lia:

  01:34 a.m. 05/08/01 -0400, L Gallegos wrote:
>If you hold a domain name, you want the IC which doesn not exist.  You
>could also join the non-commecial SO,
There's no such Non-Comercial SO.  Which exists is a Non-Commercial 
Constituency, and right now we just
admite as members Non-Commercial Organizations.

>if your site falls into that
>category.  There is no prohibition on joining more than one.
yes..other constituencies are accepting individuals.

>The bone of
>contention is that there is no place for the individual domain name
>holder or small business that is not controlled by a faction that is at
>cross purposes with that part of the community.  The major
>corporations have the business SO, the IP interests have their SO, the
>non-coms have theirs, but everyone else is in limbo with no voice.
Lia...Constituencies, not SO.   SO is for DNSO, ASO and PSO

Best Regards
Vany



>On 8 May 2001, at 12:42, McMeikan, Andrew wrote:
>
> > No I was not confused, just trying to get it stated in a way that would
> > avoid confusion.
> >
> > I guess I did not succeed.  I will state my opinions so that hopefully my
> > position will be clearer.
> >
> > * I challenge no ones right to do stuff one the net, although I challenge
> > ICANN for its attempt to limit others rights.
> >
> > * If there is to be a body like ICANN that does wish to decide what can and
> > can not be done, then as many that are affected should be represented.
> >
> > * There are other things on the net than web pages and these need to be
> > protected just as much.
> >
> > * I own a domain name with non-commercial content hosted on 'free' web
> > providers, I want to be in a constituency and be heard.
> >
> > * there used to be a net before DNS and there will still be one after its
> > gone.
> >
> >
> >  cya, Andrew...
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:       Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales [SMTP:vany@sdnp.org.pa]
> > > Sent:       Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:31 AM
> > > To: GA
> > > Subject:    RE: [ga] MOTION: Request for a GA resolution on an IDN
> > > holders' constituency (IC)
> > >
> > > Hi Andrew:
> > >
> > > I have realized that you are confused between the At Large and the IC.
> > >
> > > The IC and Individual Domain Names Holders.  The At Large membership are
> > > any Internet user holds or not holds a domain, that are interested in the
> > > policy developing in the subjects of:  Domain Names, IP addresses space
> > > and Protocols.
> > >
> > > El lun, 07 may 2001, McMeikan, Andrew escribió:
> > > > I think that to propose the creation of an IC it at least needs a
> > > > little definition to go along with it rather than just implied on the
> > > > subject
> > > line.
> > > >
> >  <snip>
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
IT Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
a member of the Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency of the 
ICANN's DNSO
e-mail:  vany@sdnp.org.pa
Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
Fax:  (507)  230-3455

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html