Re: [ga] MOTION: Request for a GA resolution on an IDN holders' c onstituency (IC)

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Eric, Andrew and all assembly members,

  Well we now have three seconds.  Good!  I tid bit of progress
perhaps?  Lets hope so...

Eric Dierker wrote:

> Us dot commoners are completely behind this obvious truth.  All of the small details
> should be worked out internally once we have our constituency.
>
> I "here here" Jeff's second of Joop's motion.
>
> PLEASE GIVE US A STARTING POINT AND EMPOWER THE USER!  INTERNETSTAKEHOLDERS ARE
> ENTITLED TO NO LESS.
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> > Leah and all assembly members,
> >
> >   I have to agree wit Leah as do our [INEGroup] members.  And repeatedly
> > attempts have been made for and IC or IDNO to become a constituency
> > yet the ICANN BoD has refused to recognize such self forming constituency
> > to be recognized or otherwise formulated.
> >
> >   In similar fashion the @large has been postponed due to a questionable
> > need of endless "Studies" to be done in order for such a  body within ICANN
> > to be recognized.  All the while of course the ICANN BoD has been
> > making policy in their names as if these stakeholders support such policies.
> > SOme would refer to such a situation as misrepresentation, I call it what it
> > really is, Fraud.  Yet using such a term (Fard) seems to engender very
> > spirited debate and constant back biting that never concludes (or has yet to)
> > in a resolution.  And again the ICANN BoD continues to claim they represent
> > these interests even though they have no voice or valid vote.  As such, it would
> > seem reasonable that such a situation is inconceivable to the extent of
> > bordering on the insane.
> >
> > L Gallegos wrote:
> >
> > > If you hold a domain name, you want the IC which doesn not exist.  You
> > > could also join the non-commecial SO, if your site falls into that
> > > category.  There is no prohibition on joining more than one.  The bone of
> > > contention is that there is no place for the individual domain name
> > > holder or small business that is not controlled by a faction that is at
> > > cross purposes with that part of the community.  The major
> > > corporations have the business SO, the IP interests have their SO, the
> > > non-coms have theirs, but everyone else is in limbo with no voice.
> > >
> > > We need the at-large and we need an SO for individuals and small
> > > business.  Those are the ones being mauled by the major corps and IP
> > > interests.
> > >
> > > Leah
> > >

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html