[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] Consensus vote - "no" on procedural grounds
At 05:24 PM 12/11/1999 , bob broxton wrote:
>3. This vote should not be taken until consideration has been given to
>the recent increase in the length of Domain names to 67 characters as
>the result of work done by the IETF. This is a fairly significant move
>which has received little publicity.
I believe there is no such IETF work. Domain name fields have always been
legal up to 64 characters.
> By this action the "shortage" of available domain names is
>somewhat mitigated - a tremendous benefit to those who have been shut
The shortage has nothing to do with the length of the field, bur rather the
flatness of the tree.
Dave Crocker <email@example.com>
Brandenburg Consulting <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253, Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA